
Patrick McNeill
Larry King on CNN featured the case of Patrick McNeill and new evidence that a famed pathologist says proves Patrick was murdered in 1997. Click here to watch the Larry King interview. This is the first time that former FBI Profiler, Candice DeLong and Dr. Wecht have commented on the case. I want to highlight the new information they shared, but I encourage you to watch the segment that also interviewed Patrick’s parents, former detectives Kevin Gannon and Anthony Duarte and Prof. Lee Gilbertson.
During the segment, Dr. Wecht said that fly eggs found on McNeill prove the Fordham College student was dead before he went into the water.
WECHT: I’m saying that the fly larvae have been laid in the groin area. It’s an indoor fly, could not have been an outdoor fly. It was an indoor fly. And the larvae were there, did not move ahead into the later stage. So we have a body that was already dead before it was placed in the water.
KING: I got you. You’re saying he was murdered?
WECHT: I would call it a homicide, yes.
KING: Were you impressed with what Dr. Wecht had to say?
CANDICE DELONG, FORMER FBI PROFILER: Yes, regarding that particular case in New York, that certainly does sound like it was a homicide. I, however, fail to see the connection between the New York case and these other midwestern cases. Perhaps we could learn.
A couple of other interesting things DeLong and Dr. Wecht said on the show:
DELONG: Well, the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit looked extensively at this, in addition to using their violent criminal apprehension program, which is a computerized tracking system. And they don’t see any links. I don’t know if the two New York detectives have met with the profiling unit or not. And unfortunately, it’s sad but true. Now notwithstanding the Patrick McNeil (sic) case, sadly, a lot of young people do die of accidental deaths, many times drowning, on our college campuses throughout the nation.
WECHT: Larry, first of all, if I may say from a forensic, epidemiological stand point, as you pointed out in your introduction, the statistics are so stacked against this number of men, young men, Caucasian males, found in bodies of water in that cluster of states, within that period of time. Of course, there are statistical aberrations, I realize. I just wanted to point out that to the epidemiologist, it would be a weird case.
WECHT: From the forensic pathology standpoint, with regard to Patrick McNeil (sic), we have a young man who is found — he has a blood alcohol level of 0.16. Probably a third of that is postmortem putrefaction, a quarter to a third of that. So we have a relatively low level of alcohol. There’s no way in the world that this man then accidentally is going to fall into a body of water, because he as a 0.1 or a 0.12 level of alcohol.
Click here to read more about the increase of BAC after death.
Click here to read more about drinking and drowning statistics.
Kristi Piehl In the Press